Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33511 - 33520 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Jon R. Woodard v. Pammy L. Woodard
for divorce in February 2003. At trial, in October 2003, the parties primarily contested maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7142 - 2017-09-20

Michael W. Bruzas v. Cipriano Quezada-Garcia
payments it made on behalf of its plan participant, Michael W. Bruzas. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2114 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 215
At the divorce trial, the circuit court ruled that Jeffrey’s shares in the corporations were gifts and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26454 - 2014-09-15

James R. Lasky v. City of Stevens Point
conclude that the trial court correctly held that the City is immune from suit. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13035 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Alice C. Ketter
a claim. The trial court denied the motion. The State then filed a motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10621 - 2017-09-20

Charter Northbrooke Behavioral Health System, Inc. v. Village of Brown Deer
appeals from the trial court’s order reversing the board’s decision to uphold the 1996 assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14379 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Rustemeyer contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to CNH rather than to him because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36694 - 2009-06-03

State v. Michael S. Behnken
. Affirmed. ¶1 DEININGER, J.[1] The trial court, consistent with a joint sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3287 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ronald J. Lubinski
2 trial court erred when it concluded that Lubinski was not placed under arrest until state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15008 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rock County Department of Human Services v. Elaine H.
? The trial court, without objection, directed a “yes” answer to the first question, and jurors answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7239 - 2017-09-20