Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33541 - 33550 of 91511 for 1.
Search results 33541 - 33550 of 91511 for 1.
COURT OF APPEALS
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jonathan Segner appeals from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57175 - 2010-12-01
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jonathan Segner appeals from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57175 - 2010-12-01
COURT OF APPEALS
: EUGENE D. HARRINGTON, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BRUNNER, J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50176 - 2010-05-17
: EUGENE D. HARRINGTON, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BRUNNER, J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50176 - 2010-05-17
Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
: DONALD R. ZUIDMULDER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J.[1] Connie D. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2357 - 2005-03-31
: DONALD R. ZUIDMULDER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J.[1] Connie D. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2357 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy J. Davids
representation before this court. The no merit report addresses: (1) whether trial counsel was ineffective; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12153 - 2005-03-31
representation before this court. The no merit report addresses: (1) whether trial counsel was ineffective; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12153 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214796 - 2018-06-27
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214796 - 2018-06-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 (2021-22).1 After review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696184 - 2023-08-29
. § 974.06 (2021-22).1 After review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696184 - 2023-08-29
Michael E. Keyes v. Precision Machine & Manufacturing, Inc.
., Dykman, and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Precision Machine and Manufacturing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2922 - 2005-03-31
., Dykman, and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Precision Machine and Manufacturing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2922 - 2005-03-31
Louise Husby v. Kenneth Frye
). Frye argues that Husby was more negligent as a matter of law because she violated § 350.02(2)(a)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9785 - 2005-03-31
). Frye argues that Husby was more negligent as a matter of law because she violated § 350.02(2)(a)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9785 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Before Higginbotham, P.J., Dykman and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Richard Gaffney appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36882 - 2014-09-15
. Before Higginbotham, P.J., Dykman and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Richard Gaffney appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36882 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Andrew J. Peterson v. Andrew S. Peterson
. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Andrew J. Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6253 - 2017-09-19
. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Andrew J. Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6253 - 2017-09-19