Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33541 - 33550 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33541 - 33550 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion for reconsideration of the $130,000 in restitution he was ordered to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
an order denying his motion for reconsideration of the $130,000 in restitution he was ordered to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Heroux challenges the circuit court’s refusal to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109735 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Heroux challenges the circuit court’s refusal to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109735 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, entered on a jury’s verdict, and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207696 - 2018-01-30
of conviction, entered on a jury’s verdict, and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207696 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
State v. John Konaha
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Konaha argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5740 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Konaha argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5740 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Picotte argues: (1) his due process rights were violated because the State lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86078 - 2012-08-13
postconviction motion. Picotte argues: (1) his due process rights were violated because the State lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86078 - 2012-08-13
State v. James H. Lindvig
his motion for a mistrial based on the prosecutor's comment in opening statements; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
his motion for a mistrial based on the prosecutor's comment in opening statements; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Patrick Wolf
notes from the October 31, 2001 motion hearing were incomplete due to technical problems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5311 - 2017-09-19
notes from the October 31, 2001 motion hearing were incomplete due to technical problems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5311 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI). McManamy contends that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=807970 - 2024-05-31
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI). McManamy contends that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=807970 - 2024-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of first degree intentional homicide. Banks argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886293 - 2024-12-10
of first degree intentional homicide. Banks argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886293 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Tammy J. Erdmann
-CR 2 motion to suppress. We conclude that the traffic stop that led to Erdmann’s arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5917 - 2017-09-19
-CR 2 motion to suppress. We conclude that the traffic stop that led to Erdmann’s arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5917 - 2017-09-19