Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33541 - 33550 of 83431 for case codes/1000.
Search results 33541 - 33550 of 83431 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that this case is moot, and we dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 28, 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953495 - 2025-05-13
conclude that this case is moot, and we dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 28, 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953495 - 2025-05-13
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antoinette Kennedy
not guilty and the case was set for a jury trial. On March 26, 2001, the date the trial was supposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4705 - 2005-03-31
not guilty and the case was set for a jury trial. On March 26, 2001, the date the trial was supposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4705 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at issue in this case is located, the Town, in which the sidewalk also is located, is not responsible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101759 - 2017-09-21
at issue in this case is located, the Town, in which the sidewalk also is located, is not responsible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101759 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Supreme Court case law. Based upon our review 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09
Supreme Court case law. Based upon our review 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09
[PDF]
Patricia L. Grochowski v. Robert Larson
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8902 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8902 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arose from the involvement in the case of the Walworth County No. 2019AP1287 2 Child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365733 - 2021-05-12
arose from the involvement in the case of the Walworth County No. 2019AP1287 2 Child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365733 - 2021-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Expert testimony is required to define the standard of care in a medical malpractice case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216681 - 2018-07-31
Expert testimony is required to define the standard of care in a medical malpractice case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216681 - 2018-07-31
State v. Mario D. Harrell
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Malinowski
in the military. The juror did not know that the man he spoke with had any connection with the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5705 - 2017-09-19
in the military. The juror did not know that the man he spoke with had any connection with the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5705 - 2017-09-19