Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33551 - 33560 of 57351 for id.
Search results 33551 - 33560 of 57351 for id.
State v. John H. Ellinger
by the consumption of intoxicants to warrant an arrest. Id. Since he was unable to perform any field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7613 - 2005-03-31
by the consumption of intoxicants to warrant an arrest. Id. Since he was unable to perform any field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7613 - 2005-03-31
Waushara County v. Richard Mack
no effect on Mack. Id. at 186. Consequently, it concluded that the best sanction was to order the clerks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8019 - 2005-03-31
no effect on Mack. Id. at 186. Consequently, it concluded that the best sanction was to order the clerks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8019 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cornelius F.
very different from a valid one. Id. at 496. “[I]t is legally ineffective…. [It] may also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5916 - 2017-09-19
very different from a valid one. Id. at 496. “[I]t is legally ineffective…. [It] may also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5916 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Cornelius F.
very different from a valid one. Id. at 496. “[I]t is legally ineffective…. [It] may also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5915 - 2017-09-19
very different from a valid one. Id. at 496. “[I]t is legally ineffective…. [It] may also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5915 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William E. Conley
was reasonable, given the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel’s conduct. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12922 - 2017-09-21
was reasonable, given the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel’s conduct. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the public; and (12) the length of pretrial detention. Id. (citation and quotation marks omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73393 - 2014-09-15
of the public; and (12) the length of pretrial detention. Id. (citation and quotation marks omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73393 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Timothy G. Whiteagle v. Anne E.W. Johnson
there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7607 - 2017-09-19
there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7607 - 2017-09-19
State v. George L. Jones
is permitted as long as “the purpose is reasonable and the period of detention is not unjustifiably long.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16320 - 2005-03-31
is permitted as long as “the purpose is reasonable and the period of detention is not unjustifiably long.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16320 - 2005-03-31
Logemann Brothers Company v. Redlin Browne
that the IRS uses to close and compromise cases.[2] Id. at 555. After the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9861 - 2005-03-31
that the IRS uses to close and compromise cases.[2] Id. at 555. After the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9861 - 2005-03-31
Daniel K. T., Jr. v. Sara K. L.
actually pronounced and not to what the court ought to or intended to adjudge. Id. at 515, 96 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13873 - 2005-03-31
actually pronounced and not to what the court ought to or intended to adjudge. Id. at 515, 96 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13873 - 2005-03-31