Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33551 - 33560 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 33551 - 33560 of 64027 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient to entitle the movant to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713814 - 2023-10-17
sufficient to entitle the movant to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713814 - 2023-10-17
City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
otherwise noted. [2] The record contains no transcript of the municipal court trial. [3] Crossfield argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31
otherwise noted. [2] The record contains no transcript of the municipal court trial. [3] Crossfield argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31
Kristin Galatowitsch v. James Wanat
on appeal, we conclude the record is insufficient for them to do so.[8] Therefore, we do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2179 - 2005-03-31
on appeal, we conclude the record is insufficient for them to do so.[8] Therefore, we do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2179 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demetrius R. Powell
or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence imposed.” State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 782, 482 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5833 - 2005-03-31
or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence imposed.” State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 782, 482 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5833 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maria S.
find that there is ‘any credible evidence in the record on which the jury could have based its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6813 - 2005-03-31
find that there is ‘any credible evidence in the record on which the jury could have based its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6813 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are clearly erroneous, nor is there anything in the Record that would lead us to so conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015033 - 2025-09-24
are clearly erroneous, nor is there anything in the Record that would lead us to so conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015033 - 2025-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the father in DNA testing. She checked the state records and found no declaration of paternal interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537039 - 2022-06-28
as the father in DNA testing. She checked the state records and found no declaration of paternal interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537039 - 2022-06-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
establish both prongs of the Strickland test is entitled to the opportunity to make the necessary record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237984 - 2019-03-26
establish both prongs of the Strickland test is entitled to the opportunity to make the necessary record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237984 - 2019-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
are afforded the presumption that the trial court acted reasonably. See id. at 681-82. If the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34575 - 2008-11-11
are afforded the presumption that the trial court acted reasonably. See id. at 681-82. If the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34575 - 2008-11-11
[PDF]
WI APP 202
]: [Do you] want to place on the record our conversation this morning? …. MR. REDDING [sic]: Uhm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29722 - 2014-09-15
]: [Do you] want to place on the record our conversation this morning? …. MR. REDDING [sic]: Uhm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29722 - 2014-09-15