Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33571 - 33580 of 63283 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33571 - 33580 of 63283 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
an order denying his motion for sentence modification.[1] Rychtik argues that a diagnosis of his mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for sentence modification.[1] Rychtik argues that a diagnosis of his mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric C. Abrams
claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to suppress his saliva, blood and hair test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10631 - 2005-03-31
claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to suppress his saliva, blood and hair test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10631 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the Wangerins’ motion for a more definite statement as to the three remaining allegations in the amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72142 - 2014-09-15
the Wangerins’ motion for a more definite statement as to the three remaining allegations in the amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72142 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, and from a consolidated postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial.[1] The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49274 - 2010-04-26
, and from a consolidated postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial.[1] The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49274 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
conduct charges. Stiglitz objected to the motion because the State failed to make the motion within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2983 - 2017-09-19
conduct charges. Stiglitz objected to the motion because the State failed to make the motion within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2983 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion to dismiss arguing that Shelton’s action was barred based on the doctrine of claim preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
a motion to dismiss arguing that Shelton’s action was barred based on the doctrine of claim preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Maus filed a motion for a new trial, which the federal court denied. Maus then filed a complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848542 - 2024-09-12
. Maus filed a motion for a new trial, which the federal court denied. Maus then filed a complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848542 - 2024-09-12
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2011AP1030-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2009CF330
appeals a criminal conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77892 - 2014-09-15
appeals a criminal conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77892 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court entered November 11, 2008, granting the postconviction motion of John C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46452 - 2010-02-02
an order of the circuit court entered November 11, 2008, granting the postconviction motion of John C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46452 - 2010-02-02
State v. Argyle L. Hagen
). Prior to entering the plea, Hagen filed a suppression motion, challenging the underlying arrest. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16297 - 2005-03-31
). Prior to entering the plea, Hagen filed a suppression motion, challenging the underlying arrest. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16297 - 2005-03-31