Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33571 - 33580 of 39862 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 33571 - 33580 of 39862 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
that under the plea agreement, “[i]f needed London Dabney would testify consistently with the statement he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
that under the plea agreement, “[i]f needed London Dabney would testify consistently with the statement he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77975 - 2012-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and expense statements to determine “how this property would customarily sell”— i.e., analysis under tiers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243056 - 2019-07-03
and expense statements to determine “how this property would customarily sell”— i.e., analysis under tiers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243056 - 2019-07-03
COURT OF APPEALS
in voir dire. Forget everything I said in my opening statement, and forget everything I have said to you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
in voir dire. Forget everything I said in my opening statement, and forget everything I have said to you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
2009 WI APP 64
, but Ninham does not pursue that avenue of relief on appeal. [2] Ninham’s statement of the issues also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35690 - 2009-05-26
, but Ninham does not pursue that avenue of relief on appeal. [2] Ninham’s statement of the issues also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35690 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; a statement from Hynes; a congratulatory note from the sentencing court concerning Hynes’s then- imminent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100893 - 2017-09-21
; a statement from Hynes; a congratulatory note from the sentencing court concerning Hynes’s then- imminent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100893 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a statement of the facts that complies with Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d) and (e). Rather, she editorializes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
a statement of the facts that complies with Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d) and (e). Rather, she editorializes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
Certification
325, 782 N.W.2d 682 (court of appeals may not “dismiss a statement in a prior case from [the supreme
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110321 - 2014-04-14
325, 782 N.W.2d 682 (court of appeals may not “dismiss a statement in a prior case from [the supreme
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110321 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that needs to be shown”—although she later No. 2024AP414 4 amended her statement that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
that needs to be shown”—although she later No. 2024AP414 4 amended her statement that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
” is not exactly that. The statement says that “[o]n April 95 through 2001, I mistakenly stated that Walter E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
” is not exactly that. The statement says that “[o]n April 95 through 2001, I mistakenly stated that Walter E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
State v. David L. Comey
-1175-CR 5 The prosecutor disputed Comey’s statement that the IRS had exonerated him, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13931 - 2014-09-15
-1175-CR 5 The prosecutor disputed Comey’s statement that the IRS had exonerated him, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13931 - 2014-09-15