Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33571 - 33580 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 33571 - 33580 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Stephen V. Hannigan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
. Hannigan contends on appeal that the trial court erroneously interpreted the statutes and decided disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14489 - 2005-03-31
. Hannigan contends on appeal that the trial court erroneously interpreted the statutes and decided disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14489 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
of the violation following a trial in the Madison Municipal Court.[2] He filed a timely appeal to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31
of the violation following a trial in the Madison Municipal Court.[2] He filed a timely appeal to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Albert Trostel & Sons Company v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
, Sentry Insurance, and Northwestern National Insurance Company. Trostel claims that: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9145 - 2017-09-19
, Sentry Insurance, and Northwestern National Insurance Company. Trostel claims that: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9145 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
excluded one of his treatment providers from testifying at his discharge trial regarding the “incidents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088821 - 2026-03-10
excluded one of his treatment providers from testifying at his discharge trial regarding the “incidents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088821 - 2026-03-10
[PDF]
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Sheffield Systems, Inc.
appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Wisconsin Bell on its claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12074 - 2017-09-21
appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Wisconsin Bell on its claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12074 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 192
because procedurally, the case was still in the trial court. Accordingly, the attorney was perplexed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29801 - 2007-08-27
because procedurally, the case was still in the trial court. Accordingly, the attorney was perplexed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29801 - 2007-08-27
State v. Rachel W. Kelty
constitutional protections against double jeopardy. The trial court denied her motion, and she appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7045 - 2005-03-31
constitutional protections against double jeopardy. The trial court denied her motion, and she appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because it was obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights; and (2) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84417 - 2014-09-15
because it was obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights; and (2) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84417 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court: (1) erroneously concluded his annual income was approximately $70,000 for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143433 - 2017-09-21
the trial court: (1) erroneously concluded his annual income was approximately $70,000 for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143433 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - September 2009
in adopting new language in § 980.09, “when it held that the standard for granting a discharge trial had
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40661 - 2014-09-15
in adopting new language in § 980.09, “when it held that the standard for granting a discharge trial had
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40661 - 2014-09-15