Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33571 - 33580 of 38463 for t's.

[PDF] State v. Gerald A. Edson
for a supervisory writ, he decided to proceed with trial in F-941926: [T]he stay of the proceedings [F-942539
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8401 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Mighty T. Howell
was overwhelming. As we previously concluded in Howell’s direct appeal: [T]he trial court [stated in making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25906 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael Brandt
questionnaire was inconsequential, stating: “[I]t is important to note that the Court did not, in its oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12516 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
that “[i]t’s not the whole tape, obviously.” On appeal, the County suggests for the first time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104846 - 2013-11-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
conviction or grant a new trial in the interest of justice. Canales contends that “[t]he highly improbable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108943 - 2014-03-10

State v. Joshua N. Briggs
provides “[t]he defendant shall file an appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12547 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 52
)(a) (2015-16) (“[T]he defendant may request that the forfeiture proceedings be adjourned ….”). In 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704059 - 2023-11-14

Grant County Department of Social Services v. Unified Board of Grant and Iowa Counties
requires a court order protectively placing Jane there. See Agnes T. v. Milwaukee County, 189 Wis. 2d 520
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6245 - 2005-03-31

Ronald Waites v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. Wisconsin Adm. Code § DOC 303.86(4) specifically provides that "[t]wo anonymous statements by different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9153 - 2005-03-31

State v. Hayes Johnson
States Supreme Court, although recognizing that “[t]o punish a person because he has done what the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12466 - 2005-03-31