Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33581 - 33590 of 83486 for case codes/1000.
Search results 33581 - 33590 of 83486 for case codes/1000.
State v. Wade L.
. THE CLERK: December 8th, two o'clock, Branch 9 case, initial appearance. [COUNSEL]: I -- Well, I just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9106 - 2005-03-31
. THE CLERK: December 8th, two o'clock, Branch 9 case, initial appearance. [COUNSEL]: I -- Well, I just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356008 - 2021-04-14
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356008 - 2021-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197872 - 2017-10-12
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197872 - 2017-10-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
was motivated by Jackson’s failure to appear as a victim witness in a different case. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35365 - 2014-09-15
was motivated by Jackson’s failure to appear as a victim witness in a different case. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35365 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157112 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157112 - 2017-09-21
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
that the facts of the Washington incidents were very similar to those alleged in this case. The court observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12072 - 2005-03-31
that the facts of the Washington incidents were very similar to those alleged in this case. The court observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12072 - 2005-03-31
Susan R. Schlough v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company
N.W.2d at 105-06. The rule applied in the Walley cases was not abrogated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10580 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d at 105-06. The rule applied in the Walley cases was not abrogated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10580 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the case as a civil forfeiture, first offense. On February 21, 1997, Shulka was convicted in Pierce County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26883 - 2006-10-23
the case as a civil forfeiture, first offense. On February 21, 1997, Shulka was convicted in Pierce County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26883 - 2006-10-23
State v. Nate Wilson
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31