Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33581 - 33590 of 98406 for court records search online.

[PDF] State v. Stanley Lindsey
legal standards.” Id. Based on the record, this court is satisfied that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael D. Singleton
are deemed abandoned). NO. 96-0626-CR 3 court correct the record. In support of its argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20

State v. Michael D. Singleton
that the trial court correct the record. In support of its argument, the State submitted affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mary Verdev v. St. Florian Catholic Church
. Having reviewed the record, we cannot conclude that the dismissal sanction ordered by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11040 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and complaint by mailing them to the defendant’s attorney of record and then filing the same with the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=494789 - 2022-03-16

[PDF] NOTICE
in the record contradicting the court’s recollection, and we therefore have no basis to conclude otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36189 - 2014-09-15

State v. Christopher N. Pflieger
argues that the record fails to support the trial court’s conclusion that he represents a significant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6921 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the record does not support the claim that the court had any expectation as to sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20

[PDF] State v. Christopher N. Pflieger
). ¶7 “Circuit courts are required to specify the objectives of the sentence on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6921 - 2017-09-20

State v. James Zamitalo
of persuasion on the motion.” Zamitalo fails to cite to that part of the record which contains the “court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10818 - 2005-03-31