Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33581 - 33590 of 65968 for e j.
Search results 33581 - 33590 of 65968 for e j.
State v. William Lee Brown
waiver of the right to trial by jury: [W]e hold that any waiver of the defendant’s right to trial by jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13495 - 2005-03-31
waiver of the right to trial by jury: [W]e hold that any waiver of the defendant’s right to trial by jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13495 - 2005-03-31
Dennis C. Marth v. Judy P. Smith
of the respondents, the cause was submitted on the memorandum of James E. Doyle, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14672 - 2005-03-31
of the respondents, the cause was submitted on the memorandum of James E. Doyle, attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14672 - 2005-03-31
Jamyi W. v. Keith H.
, that it is violated by “[w]hoever, with intent to harass or intimidate another person … [e]ngages in a course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15962 - 2005-03-31
, that it is violated by “[w]hoever, with intent to harass or intimidate another person … [e]ngages in a course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15962 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clyde B. Williams
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Racine County: bruce e. schroeder, Judge. Appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14806 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Racine County: bruce e. schroeder, Judge. Appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14806 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 102.23(1)(e). ¶7 The sole issue on appeal is whether Hartfield’s conduct was misconduct under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53134 - 2014-09-15
. § 102.23(1)(e). ¶7 The sole issue on appeal is whether Hartfield’s conduct was misconduct under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53134 - 2014-09-15
State v. Derrick L Waller
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: LEE E. WELLS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10412 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: LEE E. WELLS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10412 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rule 809.19(1)(e) (“The argument on each issue must … contain the contention of the appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58204 - 2010-12-28
. Rule 809.19(1)(e) (“The argument on each issue must … contain the contention of the appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58204 - 2010-12-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
from an order of the circuit court for Richland County: EDWARD E. LEINEWEBER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33677 - 2014-09-15
from an order of the circuit court for Richland County: EDWARD E. LEINEWEBER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33677 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
review is deferential. “[W]e start with the presumption that the circuit court acted reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34278 - 2014-09-15
review is deferential. “[W]e start with the presumption that the circuit court acted reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34278 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
] McCradic cites to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(4), a rule that does not currently exist. In any event, McCradic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101680 - 2013-09-09
] McCradic cites to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(4), a rule that does not currently exist. In any event, McCradic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101680 - 2013-09-09