Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33591 - 33600 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
Search results 33591 - 33600 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The trial court also acknowledged that it was “well aware of the history of this case and the treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
. The trial court also acknowledged that it was “well aware of the history of this case and the treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102985 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102985 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings. Her briefs in this case were of great assistance to the court. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32970 - 2008-06-09
court’s findings. Her briefs in this case were of great assistance to the court. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32970 - 2008-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 27, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52587 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 27, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52587 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
the reverse-waiver motion. Dixon subsequently elected to have his case tried to the trial court and was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81072 - 2012-04-16
the reverse-waiver motion. Dixon subsequently elected to have his case tried to the trial court and was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81072 - 2012-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
it to. (Record and case citations omitted.) We agree with the State’s reasoning. The trial court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24
it to. (Record and case citations omitted.) We agree with the State’s reasoning. The trial court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
of a due process violation. Neither party has provided this court with Wisconsin case law directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62495 - 2011-04-06
of a due process violation. Neither party has provided this court with Wisconsin case law directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62495 - 2011-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
to warrant the self-defense instruction. Rather, we understand the court to have ruled that, in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50428 - 2010-05-26
to warrant the self-defense instruction. Rather, we understand the court to have ruled that, in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50428 - 2010-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS
We appreciate the circuit court’s excellent case summary and decision and borrow heavily from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143838 - 2015-07-07
We appreciate the circuit court’s excellent case summary and decision and borrow heavily from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143838 - 2015-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
for these cases clearly establishes that the trial court carefully considered all of the testimony given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121736 - 2014-09-15
for these cases clearly establishes that the trial court carefully considered all of the testimony given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121736 - 2014-09-15