Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3361 - 3370 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3361 - 3370 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Jordan
consent, all as party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10995 - 2017-09-19
consent, all as party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10995 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order denying his motion for additional sentence credit. He argues that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105313 - 2013-12-09
from an order denying his motion for additional sentence credit. He argues that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105313 - 2013-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 11, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
to joint custody and held open placement and child support because they were residing together. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98052 - 2013-06-10
to joint custody and held open placement and child support because they were residing together. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98052 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., born March 8, 2005. A judgment of paternity was entered in 2007. The parties stipulated to joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98052 - 2014-09-15
., born March 8, 2005. A judgment of paternity was entered in 2007. The parties stipulated to joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98052 - 2014-09-15
Lori B. v. Steven B.
Steven. Until June 1995, she and Steven had joint custody of Kristin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14663 - 2005-03-31
Steven. Until June 1995, she and Steven had joint custody of Kristin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark O. Williams
a postconviction motion order denying him six days’ sentencing credit, arguing that his custody in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19
a postconviction motion order denying him six days’ sentencing credit, arguing that his custody in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark O. Williams
is identical in law to the assault charge for the same event. Williams also appeals a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
is identical in law to the assault charge for the same event. Williams also appeals a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
corpus claim is moot, and that sentence credit is not applicable because Shelton’s custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59277 - 2014-09-15
corpus claim is moot, and that sentence credit is not applicable because Shelton’s custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59277 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the State’s motion to dismiss, holding that while Shelton should not have been kept in custody for 143 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59277 - 2011-01-25
the State’s motion to dismiss, holding that while Shelton should not have been kept in custody for 143 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59277 - 2011-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The issues are whether the circuit court, in denying his suppression motion, correctly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793290 - 2024-04-25
. The issues are whether the circuit court, in denying his suppression motion, correctly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793290 - 2024-04-25