Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3361 - 3370 of 19332 for transfer by affidavit.

[MS WORD] CV-414: Injunction (Child Abuse)
the wireless telephone service provider transfer to the petitioner each telephone number(s) he/she or a minor
/formdisplay/CV-414.doc?formNumber=CV-414&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2026-04-23

State v. Louis Ray
that his request to have his parole transferred to Minnesota had been denied, the prosecutor helped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5187 - 2005-03-31

[MS WORD] JC-1692: Injunction in Juvenile Court (Child Abuse)
) form. |_| 9. The petitioner has requested the wireless telephone service provider transfer
/formdisplay/JC-1692.doc?formNumber=JC-1692&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2022-08-08

[PDF] JC-1692; Injunction in Juvenile Court (Child Abuse)
(CV-803) form. 9. The petitioner has requested the wireless telephone service provider transfer
/formdisplay/JC-1692.pdf?formNumber=JC-1692&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-08-08

[MS WORD] CV-404: Injunction (Domestic Abuse)
requested the wireless telephone service provider transfer to the petitioner each telephone number(s) he/she
/formdisplay/CV-404.doc?formNumber=CV-404&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2026-04-23

COURT OF APPEALS
in the law,” and his multiple transfers among correctional institutions rendered him unable “to marshall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30604 - 2007-10-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
); see also WIS. STAT. § 968.12 (2015-16). ¶10 According to Voit, the affidavit did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195541 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
motion for summary judgment is supported by affidavits averring that: (1) the assessment was undertaken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33969 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Lance R. Ward
. 385, 117 S. Ct. 1416 (1997). We agree with Ward that the affidavit filed in support of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12738 - 2017-09-21

Johanna L. Manke v. Physicians Insurance Company
and it was prejudicial to the defense.[4] Accompanying the motion was an affidavit of a paralegal employed by defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21325 - 2006-03-22