Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33611 - 33620 of 83516 for case code.
Search results 33611 - 33620 of 83516 for case code.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facie case” because it “destroyed” the Bank’s defense—i.e., that Roberts did not know the Nunnerys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86571 - 2014-09-15
facie case” because it “destroyed” the Bank’s defense—i.e., that Roberts did not know the Nunnerys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86571 - 2014-09-15
Fredric P. Spindler v. Bonita B. Spindler
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10451 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Prentiss M. McKinnie
2002 WI App 82 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2764-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4489 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 82 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2764-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4489 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Darrel W. Howsden
(1977), it was inappropriate in this case to exclude the witness's testimony because Howsden had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9479 - 2017-09-19
(1977), it was inappropriate in this case to exclude the witness's testimony because Howsden had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9479 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jimmie Baldwin
not have been allowed to testify (and who also was convicted in separate cases of crimes relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10125 - 2017-09-19
not have been allowed to testify (and who also was convicted in separate cases of crimes relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10125 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
County circuit court case No. 2012GN16, the subject of Kevin K. v. Advocacy Programs, No. 2012AP1969-FT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99393 - 2014-09-15
County circuit court case No. 2012GN16, the subject of Kevin K. v. Advocacy Programs, No. 2012AP1969-FT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99393 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶9 Hoey argues that, in her case, the officer failed to provide a sufficient demarcation between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432581 - 2021-09-30
. ¶9 Hoey argues that, in her case, the officer failed to provide a sufficient demarcation between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432581 - 2021-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
in cases involving a second trial. We are not persuaded that retrial on the burglary charge would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
in cases involving a second trial. We are not persuaded that retrial on the burglary charge would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
Manitowoc County v. Leesa J.Y.
on March 11, 1998, in order to allow William’s attorney to prepare his case. A two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14347 - 2005-03-31
on March 11, 1998, in order to allow William’s attorney to prepare his case. A two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14347 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph C. Jansen
permission to enter a room. In that case, the police officers were on duty to check hotel rooms for anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2924 - 2005-03-31
permission to enter a room. In that case, the police officers were on duty to check hotel rooms for anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2924 - 2005-03-31