Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33611 - 33620 of 69044 for had.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the Jolins had not explained why they initially defaulted, or why they waited so long to seek further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109289 - 2017-09-21

State v. Patrick T. Roberts
on the ground that his trial counsel's plea legal advice had the effect of inducing the plea by threat. Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9606 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Rossa contested the action, claiming that he had disposed of Heiman’s and Reed’s property lawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107789 - 2014-02-05

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
“no defenses stated.” However, Bengtson’s motion reads, “I had mailed in a not guilty plea received June 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27870 - 2007-01-22

[PDF] NOTICE
colloquy as to whether Gering had previously been committed or received treatment for mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33004 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary P. Donovan
to obtain dismissal of charges against an acquaintance who had not been enrolled in the program
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17280 - 2017-09-21

Marva Harris v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
it ruled her complaint had been filed seven minutes too late. Regardless of the merit of that argument, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14730 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Petitioners’ Response to Attorney Zales Comments
the position had no conflicts of interest, while the SLAC position could have constant conflicts of interest
/scrules/docs/2304_zalesreponse.pdf - 2023-12-28

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - December
in his back, arm, and pelvis. At the time his case was filed in the Supreme Court, he had accumulated
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20495 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Shoreline Park Preservation, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
, which had been identified No. 94-2512 -3- by a "scoping" process,1 to the secretaries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8128 - 2017-09-19