Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33611 - 33620 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 33611 - 33620 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Kerry Tucker
and was made in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of record. State v. Pharr, 115 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8875 - 2017-09-19
and was made in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of record. State v. Pharr, 115 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8875 - 2017-09-19
State v. Josh F. Flowers
was not knowingly and voluntarily made. Although nothing in the record indicates that a court decided Flowers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13413 - 2005-03-31
was not knowingly and voluntarily made. Although nothing in the record indicates that a court decided Flowers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13413 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and condition than is this court relying on a paper record. No. 2006AP2631-CR 10 ¶24 A court shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30209 - 2014-09-15
and condition than is this court relying on a paper record. No. 2006AP2631-CR 10 ¶24 A court shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30209 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
us to develop 1 In reviewing the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36075 - 2014-09-15
us to develop 1 In reviewing the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36075 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 175
, the trial court stated on the record that before voir dire, he had met with both attorneys to let them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56998 - 2014-09-15
, the trial court stated on the record that before voir dire, he had met with both attorneys to let them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56998 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The supreme court explained that “nothing in the record [indicated] that [the property owner’s] operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235464 - 2019-02-21
. The supreme court explained that “nothing in the record [indicated] that [the property owner’s] operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235464 - 2019-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08(2)). On appeal, “we examine the record to determine whether there [are] disputed material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47080 - 2010-03-30
. § 802.08(2)). On appeal, “we examine the record to determine whether there [are] disputed material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47080 - 2010-03-30
[PDF]
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. David H. Schwarz
to supplement the record with a letter from counsel stating counsel's intent to file an appeal is denied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17475 - 2017-09-21
to supplement the record with a letter from counsel stating counsel's intent to file an appeal is denied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17475 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
such a ruling unless the court failed to apply the proper legal standard or the record lacks reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270025 - 2020-07-16
such a ruling unless the court failed to apply the proper legal standard or the record lacks reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270025 - 2020-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
that Rowell had not demonstrated a “fair and just reason” for plea withdrawal in that the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50339 - 2010-05-24
that Rowell had not demonstrated a “fair and just reason” for plea withdrawal in that the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50339 - 2010-05-24