Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33621 - 33630 of 57358 for id.

Penny M. Z. v. John D. R.
argued that it was constitutionally defective. Id. at 405, 407 N.W.2d at 536. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12169 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
modification on reflection and second thoughts alone.” Id. “However, it may base a sentence modification upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99700 - 2013-07-22

[PDF] NOTICE
they are clearly erroneous. Id. at 634. However, determinations of whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33046 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] County of Waushara v. Richard Mack
behavior. The court concluded that the imposition of monetary sanctions had no effect on Mack. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8051 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” means that counsel’s alleged errors actually had an adverse effect on the defense. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149725 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
). The circuit court denied the motion, and we affirmed. See id., ¶¶1, 4. ¶5 In March 2014, Rowell filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123553 - 2014-10-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
will be found in a particular place.” Id., ¶19. Due to the strong preference for searches conducted pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355791 - 2021-04-13

[PDF] State v. Alphonso Hubanks
in the outcome. Id. at 694. Hubanks has not established ineffective assistance or prejudice from his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13266 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
variations of the jury instruction issue Wimpie again attempts to raise on its merits. See id. at 2-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27185 - 2006-11-20

[PDF] State v. Gary O. McKenzie
is permitted only to correct a “manifest injustice.” Id. “The ‘manifest injustice’ test requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26196 - 2017-09-21