Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33621 - 33630 of 64042 for records/1000.

[PDF] State v. Maria S.
that there is ‘any credible evidence in the record on which the jury could have based its decision,’ we will affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6813 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The supreme court explained that “nothing in the record [indicated] that [the property owner’s] operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235464 - 2019-02-21

[PDF] NOTICE
as an order denying its motion for consideration. ¶2 We conclude the record supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32390 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
such a ruling unless the court failed to apply the proper legal standard or the record lacks reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270025 - 2020-07-16

[PDF] NOTICE
had restrictive covenants that were recorded in the Adams County Register of Deeds office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32319 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Dr. Gatzke of her Sjogren’s diagnosis in May 1998. Swanson’s dental records show that between May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240152 - 2019-05-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the record for the jury’s verdicts, noting that only ten of the twelve jurors agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100543 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a proper final order or judgment was in the record when he filed his notice of appeal. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36075 - 2009-04-07

State v. Adrienne Luber
standard, but we reach a different result on the application of the standard to the record than did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2275 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
this finding, and our own review of the record suggests that this finding was not clearly erroneous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57087 - 2014-09-15