Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33621 - 33630 of 38529 for t's.

[PDF] Michael A. Yamat v. Verma L. B.
, among other things, denied Attorney Yamat payment of his fees from Verma’s estate, stating: “[T]his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11258 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
use of to expedite a trial.” However, “‘[t]he constitutional requirements of a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92112 - 2013-01-28

State v. Mighty T. Howell
was overwhelming. As we previously concluded in Howell’s direct appeal: [T]he trial court [stated in making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25906 - 2006-08-29

State v. Davon R. Malcom
or testified to at the preliminary hearing. Id. at 616. However, “[t]he charges must be ‘related in terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3646 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the date of the final hearing. The stipulation emphasized that “[t]ime is of the essence with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76515 - 2012-01-17

COURT OF APPEALS
considered.” In Lamar, the court held “[t]he Board must allow for meaningful certiorari review by stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31988 - 2008-03-04

Anna M. Rasmussen v. Larry D. Rasmussen
” and that “[t]heir testimony was tainted by collusion and, therefore, incredible and biased as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11540 - 2005-03-31

[PDF]
was that the officer smelled alcohol from the defendant’s vehicle during an investigative stop, and “[t]he weakness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776116 - 2024-03-14

Susan Dudacek v. Daniel G. Hovland
forth in detail the conduct of both parties leading up to the injury-causing incident, and “[t]he upshot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12319 - 2005-03-31

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Daniel J. Raymonds
found by the referee in this proceeding, the Honorable Robert T. McGraw, Reserve Judge, as well as other
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17266 - 2005-03-31