Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33651 - 33660 of 46054 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 33651 - 33660 of 46054 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the officers or others; the test is not probable cause.” Id. A protective sweep may also be employed when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34862 - 2014-09-15
to the officers or others; the test is not probable cause.” Id. A protective sweep may also be employed when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34862 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Crystal Glynn
court employs a two-prong test to determine the admissibility of the other acts evidence. State v. La
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12149 - 2017-09-21
court employs a two-prong test to determine the admissibility of the other acts evidence. State v. La
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12149 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and one-half days of “the crucible”—a final test in Marine recruit training that lasted fifty-four hours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
and one-half days of “the crucible”—a final test in Marine recruit training that lasted fifty-four hours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
State v. Shawn E. Avery
be extended and a new investigation begun. Id. Furthermore, the validity of the extension is tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31
be extended and a new investigation begun. Id. Furthermore, the validity of the extension is tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31
William Olson v. Sidney Kaprelian
the settlement never conducted a hearing to test whether the restitution order was validly “set off.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9560 - 2014-06-24
the settlement never conducted a hearing to test whether the restitution order was validly “set off.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9560 - 2014-06-24
[PDF]
Shirley A. Gemas v. Susan R. Meyer
complaints of pain, not upon objective tests showing that she suffered a new injury as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12150 - 2017-09-21
complaints of pain, not upon objective tests showing that she suffered a new injury as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12150 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
not meet the test for ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel could reasonably have concluded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134234 - 2015-02-02
not meet the test for ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel could reasonably have concluded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134234 - 2015-02-02
[PDF]
State v. Joseph S. Barfoot
the prejudice prong of the test if deficient performance is not shown. See Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15713 - 2017-09-21
the prejudice prong of the test if deficient performance is not shown. See Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15713 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
AM Transportation, Inc. v. Matarah Industries, Inc.
473 (1980). If the pleadings meet this initial test, our inquiry shifts to the moving party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2436 - 2017-09-19
473 (1980). If the pleadings meet this initial test, our inquiry shifts to the moving party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2436 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
suspicion is a commonsense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35216 - 2014-09-15
suspicion is a commonsense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35216 - 2014-09-15