Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33661 - 33670 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 33661 - 33670 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
NOTICE
sergeant’s statement to him over the No. 2010AP723-CR 7 radio—that anyone leaving the area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53254 - 2014-09-15
sergeant’s statement to him over the No. 2010AP723-CR 7 radio—that anyone leaving the area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53254 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with the vehicle having been where the caller reported it. The caller’s statement that he or she was afraid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70214 - 2011-08-24
with the vehicle having been where the caller reported it. The caller’s statement that he or she was afraid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70214 - 2011-08-24
State v. Jorge T.
the § 938.18(5) factors. After considering those factors, the juvenile court must provide a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14190 - 2005-03-31
the § 938.18(5) factors. After considering those factors, the juvenile court must provide a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14190 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
in support of this statement. Thus, we again conclude that the State’s argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18072 - 2017-09-21
in support of this statement. Thus, we again conclude that the State’s argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18072 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Seth P. Hartigan
represent K.S. This was a false statement as Attorney Hartigan's certification had been extended by the SPD
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20614 - 2005-12-12
represent K.S. This was a false statement as Attorney Hartigan's certification had been extended by the SPD
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20614 - 2005-12-12
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
[of disallowance] shall contain a statement to that effect. Under § 893.80(1)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31
[of disallowance] shall contain a statement to that effect. Under § 893.80(1)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Ward
at 376, 407 N.W.2d at 245. Ward’s statements that he did not live at the apartment, that he did not keep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31
at 376, 407 N.W.2d at 245. Ward’s statements that he did not live at the apartment, that he did not keep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in voir dire. Forget everything I said in my opening statement, and forget everything I have said to you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
in voir dire. Forget everything I said in my opening statement, and forget everything I have said to you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
State v. Louis Elizondo, Jr.
.2d 205, 215-16, 500 N.W.2d 331, 336 (Ct. App. 1993); and we said that those conclusory statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
.2d 205, 215-16, 500 N.W.2d 331, 336 (Ct. App. 1993); and we said that those conclusory statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
Kay Hoverman v. Chuck Frautschi
and the intent to harass. Frautschi’s own statements at the injunction hearing provide sufficient support
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12736 - 2005-03-31
and the intent to harass. Frautschi’s own statements at the injunction hearing provide sufficient support
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12736 - 2005-03-31