Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33671 - 33680 of 39128 for c's.

Patricia S. Magyar v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan
otherwise indicated. [2] In particular, Wis. Stat. § 601.64(3)(c) specifically states: Whoever violates
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17455 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
regulations. To the contrary, Wis. Admin. Code § SPS 382.22(1)(c), which is titled “maintenance and repairs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77516 - 2012-02-01

Town of Lyndon v. Peter F. Beyer
. The term “licensee” means the holder of a retail “Class A,” “Class B,” or “Class C” license granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2889 - 2012-01-12

COURT OF APPEALS
at 58,. “[C]onduct which has innocent explanations may also give rise to a reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28894 - 2007-05-07

WI App 39 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP427-CR Complete Title ...
-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Michael C. Sanders, assistant attorney general, and J.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108953 - 2014-04-29

State v. Robert K.
was reasonable and constitutes good cause under § 48.315(2) for the January adjournment. C. The delays were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7669 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
c[a]me running out of the kitchen with a knife[,] ... yelling at me to fix [the vacuum cleaner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51165 - 2010-06-21

COURT OF APPEALS
that “reasonableness in this context is a question of law for the [c]ourt.” However Strauss does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75219 - 2011-12-14

[PDF] State v. Donald J. McGuire
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2003-04). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7563 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. In holding that counsel’s performance was deficient, the supreme court stated: “‘[C]ounsel has a duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96281 - 2014-09-15