Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33671 - 33680 of 68502 for did.
Search results 33671 - 33680 of 68502 for did.
Vernon Seay v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
against him for seeking a reclassification of his position and further determined that the University did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8777 - 2005-03-31
against him for seeking a reclassification of his position and further determined that the University did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8777 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daymon D. Tate
that the seizure of the evidence did not prejudice Tate. The trial court was “unpersuaded that the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6148 - 2005-03-31
that the seizure of the evidence did not prejudice Tate. The trial court was “unpersuaded that the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6148 - 2005-03-31
Patrick Hart v. Meadows Apartments
to the procedural history. In the first appeal, Hart hired a lawyer and the lawyer wrote a brief. Meadows did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20050 - 2005-10-25
to the procedural history. In the first appeal, Hart hired a lawyer and the lawyer wrote a brief. Meadows did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20050 - 2005-10-25
[PDF]
Sentry Insurance v. Royal Insurance Company of America
that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant's motion to enlarge the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8445 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant's motion to enlarge the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8445 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 The court did not recognize Krutz’s pro se motion as a motion for an injunction because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42705 - 2014-09-15
2 The court did not recognize Krutz’s pro se motion as a motion for an injunction because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42705 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael Crawford
because the criminal complaint did not charge him with a known offense; (2) whether there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11406 - 2017-09-19
because the criminal complaint did not charge him with a known offense; (2) whether there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11406 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
us. He did not appeal the circuit court’s 2007 order modifying the stipulation. The filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133045 - 2017-09-21
us. He did not appeal the circuit court’s 2007 order modifying the stipulation. The filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133045 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
made the decision to change your counsel, correct? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, I did. But -- THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4343 - 2017-09-19
made the decision to change your counsel, correct? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, I did. But -- THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4343 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ronald R. Yakes
operated a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Yakes’ first objection is that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12693 - 2017-09-21
operated a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Yakes’ first objection is that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12693 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; Sarah did not contest this assertion and offered no testimony or other evidence that Daniel wished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859352 - 2024-10-08
; Sarah did not contest this assertion and offered no testimony or other evidence that Daniel wished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859352 - 2024-10-08