Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3371 - 3380 of 7642 for yes.
Search results 3371 - 3380 of 7642 for yes.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
convicted of a crime; and the answer is yes if asked. How many times? The response should be 11 times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28353 - 2007-03-07
convicted of a crime; and the answer is yes if asked. How many times? The response should be 11 times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28353 - 2007-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, is that correct? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: All right, why don’t we bring the jury panel in. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42146 - 2009-10-13
, is that correct? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: All right, why don’t we bring the jury panel in. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42146 - 2009-10-13
[PDF]
State v. Marvin D. Clements
that was asked is does the verdict need to be unanimous, and the answer to that is yes. It’s in your jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3168 - 2017-09-19
that was asked is does the verdict need to be unanimous, and the answer to that is yes. It’s in your jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3168 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph Gilmore
to the officer?" Gilmore and his counsel were not present. The court returned the note to the jury with "Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8519 - 2005-03-31
to the officer?" Gilmore and his counsel were not present. The court returned the note to the jury with "Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Paul Piikkila v. Tim Loritz
. Loritz’ demeanor, his testimony. Quite frankly, I do not believe he was saying, “Oh, yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6820 - 2017-09-20
. Loritz’ demeanor, his testimony. Quite frankly, I do not believe he was saying, “Oh, yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6820 - 2017-09-20
State v. Avery T., Jr.
. THE COURT: Is that your understanding, Mr. Miller? MR. MILLER: Yes, it is and I'll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
. THE COURT: Is that your understanding, Mr. Miller? MR. MILLER: Yes, it is and I'll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rodney R. Clark
]: Yes, I do. [COURT]: All right. All right. On your no contest plea then the court finds you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2467 - 2017-09-19
]: Yes, I do. [COURT]: All right. All right. On your no contest plea then the court finds you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2467 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven S. Miller
prosecuting the case, Philip Stittleburg. One of the jurors, a Ms. Haugrud, replied: “Yes, he’s my attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16219 - 2005-03-31
prosecuting the case, Philip Stittleburg. One of the jurors, a Ms. Haugrud, replied: “Yes, he’s my attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
” for the type of test and marked the box next to “yes” because Hinzmann said he would take that test. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4208 - 2017-09-19
” for the type of test and marked the box next to “yes” because Hinzmann said he would take that test. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4208 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that explain it? [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes. (Emphasis added.) ¶10 The italicized language makes clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99875 - 2013-08-20
that explain it? [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes. (Emphasis added.) ¶10 The italicized language makes clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99875 - 2013-08-20