Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33701 - 33710 of 57317 for id.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reach.” Id. DISCUSSION ¶11 First, Moondette argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048520 - 2025-12-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for any ‘legal points arguable on their merits.’” Id., ¶¶58, 64 (citation omitted). However
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986002 - 2025-07-22

COURT OF APPEALS
,’ [are] not ... clear and unequivocal request[s] for counsel.” Id. (quoting Davis, 512 U.S. at 462). “‘Unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138234 - 2015-03-23

COURT OF APPEALS
of criminal activity. Id. at 834. These facts are interpreted in light of the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84800 - 2012-07-11

[PDF] State v. Jackie C.
because testimony safeguards accurate fact- finding and protects the parents,” id. at ¶56, and although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5340 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant as an adult.” Id., 74 Wis. 2d at 677. Rather, Becker deals with the situation where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Cornelius F.
very different from a valid one. Id. at 496. “[I]t is legally ineffective…. [It] may also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5914 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the public; and (12) the length of pretrial detention. Id. (citation and quotation marks omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73393 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Neil E. Wakershauser
,” that determines if the waiver is valid. Id. at 564. If the defendant’s understanding of the necessary facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
at sentencing, appellate courts have a strong policy against interference with that discretion. Id., ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50757 - 2014-09-15