Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33701 - 33710 of 63933 for records/1000.
Search results 33701 - 33710 of 63933 for records/1000.
State v. Jerry Lee Cox
a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13801 - 2005-03-31
a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13801 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and she has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965422 - 2025-06-03
, and she has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965422 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Jerold L. Rober
., ¶18, the circuit court must articulate the basis of the sentence on the record, McCleary v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21028 - 2017-09-21
., ¶18, the circuit court must articulate the basis of the sentence on the record, McCleary v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21028 - 2017-09-21
Hollywood Livestock, Inc. v. Andrew Pitzer
authority to reverse the trial court “if it appears from the record that the real controversy has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6646 - 2005-03-31
authority to reverse the trial court “if it appears from the record that the real controversy has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6646 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
denied the motion, ruling that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33531 - 2014-09-15
denied the motion, ruling that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33531 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100884 - 2013-08-25
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100884 - 2013-08-25
CA Blank Order
without prejudice and without costs. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97089 - 2013-05-21
without prejudice and without costs. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97089 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107784 - 2017-09-21
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107784 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Anthony Joshua
. 1 The State notes that the record on appeal does not contain any documentation for circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18454 - 2017-09-21
. 1 The State notes that the record on appeal does not contain any documentation for circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18454 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ronald A. Bodart v. James L. Hendrickson
the property free of any adverse claims that contradict facts of record by virtue of Wisconsin’s title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12473 - 2017-09-21
the property free of any adverse claims that contradict facts of record by virtue of Wisconsin’s title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12473 - 2017-09-21