Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33711 - 33720 of 70405 for his.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an order denying his motion to modify sentence. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106027 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. John P. Louderman
, be publicly reprimanded as discipline for his failure to send a document to the circuit court for its
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17429 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Bryce L. Garrett
discovered. He argues that the witness was transformed from an expert in social work, his real profession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8936 - 2017-09-19

State v. Quentin D.
court improperly refused to suppress the gun that police officers found in his possession. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15450 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
convicting him of multiple crimes. He challenges his conviction for uttering a forgery. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209742 - 2018-03-15

State v. Jeffrey A. Pluemer
crimes. His sentencing was stayed pursuant to a deferred sentencing agreement. The State later moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2193 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Klotz appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for sentence credit. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98064 - 2013-06-18

[PDF] Michael S. Elkins v. Shawn B. Schneider
BROWN, J. 1 Michael S. Elkins appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3791 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Arrmond B.
to ยง 752.31(2)(e) and (3), STATS. No. 95-3232 -2- that the dispositional order violates his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9999 - 2017-09-19

County of Winnebago v. Ralph Wachtveitl
to call a witness on his behalf. We reject both of Wachtveitl's arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8838 - 2005-03-31