Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33721 - 33730 of 60045 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 33721 - 33730 of 60045 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction claim that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because his trial counsel, Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092279 - 2026-03-17
his postconviction claim that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because his trial counsel, Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092279 - 2026-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction claim that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because his trial counsel, Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092279 - 2026-03-17
his postconviction claim that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because his trial counsel, Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092279 - 2026-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that claim. He would, however, object to paying over $20,000 in interest. He further argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763601 - 2024-02-14
that claim. He would, however, object to paying over $20,000 in interest. He further argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763601 - 2024-02-14
Spencer G. Breitreiter v. Clifton Gunderson & Company
expert testimony was necessary for proof of Breitreiter’s claim. We sustain the sanction imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10898 - 2005-03-31
expert testimony was necessary for proof of Breitreiter’s claim. We sustain the sanction imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10898 - 2005-03-31
Deborah Martin-Semrow v. Marc Raymond Semrow
, that statement, unaccompanied by any evidence of record, is insufficient to establish the firm’s claim to funds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13612 - 2005-03-31
, that statement, unaccompanied by any evidence of record, is insufficient to establish the firm’s claim to funds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13612 - 2005-03-31
Mary Ann Strnad v. Edward Strnad
that Mary Ann’s arguments defeat the change of character claim, [but] they fail in regard to identity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4220 - 2005-03-31
that Mary Ann’s arguments defeat the change of character claim, [but] they fail in regard to identity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
). In Rose’s direct appeal, he argued his March 2006 sentence was vindictive. We rejected that claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087934 - 2026-03-11
). In Rose’s direct appeal, he argued his March 2006 sentence was vindictive. We rejected that claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087934 - 2026-03-11
State v. Thomas C. Holden
trial was held on January 9 and 10, 1995. Holden claims that the prosecution withheld information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11183 - 2005-03-31
trial was held on January 9 and 10, 1995. Holden claims that the prosecution withheld information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Natalie Baker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. In September 1995, Baker was terminated. Thereafter, Baker brought this action, claiming unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11929 - 2017-09-21
. In September 1995, Baker was terminated. Thereafter, Baker brought this action, claiming unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11929 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12451 - 2005-03-31
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kachelski claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12451 - 2005-03-31