Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33741 - 33750 of 63251 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33741 - 33750 of 63251 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Christopher T. Seiler
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Seiler raises a host of No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9561 - 2017-09-19
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Seiler raises a host of No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9561 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of substantial battery and from No. 2008AP1014-CR 2 the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
of substantial battery and from No. 2008AP1014-CR 2 the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
) & (2), and 939.05, STATS. Rhodes also appeals from orders denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9011 - 2017-09-19
) & (2), and 939.05, STATS. Rhodes also appeals from orders denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
On appeal, Engen argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion in limine seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148248 - 2017-09-21
On appeal, Engen argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion in limine seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148248 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
) & (2), and 939.05, STATS. Rhodes also appeals from orders denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9010 - 2017-09-19
) & (2), and 939.05, STATS. Rhodes also appeals from orders denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9010 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on the Department’s motion to dismiss and did not address his cross-motion for summary judgment. However, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60265 - 2011-02-23
on the Department’s motion to dismiss and did not address his cross-motion for summary judgment. However, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60265 - 2011-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion.[1] Because the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86884 - 2012-09-10
his postconviction motion.[1] Because the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86884 - 2012-09-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a summary judgment motion, arguing that dismissal was required because Jeffrey lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
filed a summary judgment motion, arguing that dismissal was required because Jeffrey lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
on 1 Hebel asserts that the circuit court acted only on the Department’s motion to dismiss and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60265 - 2014-09-15
on 1 Hebel asserts that the circuit court acted only on the Department’s motion to dismiss and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60265 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher S. Vnuk
of his residence. Vnuk lived in the basement of his parents’ home. After hearings on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25239 - 2006-05-23
of his residence. Vnuk lived in the basement of his parents’ home. After hearings on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25239 - 2006-05-23