Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33751 - 33760 of 63251 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 33751 - 33760 of 63251 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
) & (2), and 939.05, STATS. Rhodes also appeals from orders denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9011 - 2017-09-19
) & (2), and 939.05, STATS. Rhodes also appeals from orders denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
On appeal, Engen argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion in limine seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148248 - 2017-09-21
On appeal, Engen argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion in limine seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148248 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a postconviction motion raising this issue and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26706 - 2014-09-15
a postconviction motion raising this issue and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26706 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
) & (2), and 939.05, STATS. Rhodes also appeals from orders denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9010 - 2017-09-19
) & (2), and 939.05, STATS. Rhodes also appeals from orders denying his motions for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9010 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on the Department’s motion to dismiss and did not address his cross-motion for summary judgment. However, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60265 - 2011-02-23
on the Department’s motion to dismiss and did not address his cross-motion for summary judgment. However, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60265 - 2011-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion.[1] Because the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86884 - 2012-09-10
his postconviction motion.[1] Because the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86884 - 2012-09-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a summary judgment motion, arguing that dismissal was required because Jeffrey lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
filed a summary judgment motion, arguing that dismissal was required because Jeffrey lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96022 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress evidence. We conclude the circuit court properly denied the motion. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39047 - 2009-08-05
motion to suppress evidence. We conclude the circuit court properly denied the motion. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39047 - 2009-08-05
[PDF]
State v. Christopher S. Vnuk
on the motion, the court granted the motion as to the evidence obtained in Vnuk’s bedroom and bathroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25239 - 2017-09-21
on the motion, the court granted the motion as to the evidence obtained in Vnuk’s bedroom and bathroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25239 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on 1 Hebel asserts that the circuit court acted only on the Department’s motion to dismiss and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60265 - 2014-09-15
on 1 Hebel asserts that the circuit court acted only on the Department’s motion to dismiss and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60265 - 2014-09-15