Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33771 - 33780 of 63283 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
motion No. 2010AP801 2 to dismiss CDI’s claim that Fakler, a former CDI employee, breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63724 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Daniel C. Krause
., and from an order denying his motion to suppress statements and evidence obtained as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14532 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dawn M. Herfel
constitutional right to an attorney. Herfel’s motion to collaterally attack her prior OWI conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19466 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
an order of the circuit court entered November 11, 2008, granting the postconviction motion of John C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46452 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in disallowing the testimony of a defense witness and by failing to grant Holmes’s motion for a mistrial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467006 - 2021-12-29

[PDF] The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition v. City of Milwaukee
court erred when it concluded at the motion to dismiss stage that the plaintiffs did not have standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4405 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
clients’ behalf, prevailed on a summary judgment motion and successfully defended that decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93178 - 2014-09-15

State v. Miguel A. Segarra
contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the cocaine that was discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6828 - 2005-03-31

The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition v. City of Milwaukee
it concluded at the motion to dismiss stage that the plaintiffs did not have standing to pursue this matter, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4405 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
complaint was dismissed and, in an order entered April 22, 2010, the court granted the Wangerins’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72142 - 2011-10-11