Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33771 - 33780 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 33771 - 33780 of 63951 for records/1000.
State v. Perry Monroe, Jr.
record precluded probation, as did several unanswered questions concerning his sources of income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13645 - 2005-03-31
record precluded probation, as did several unanswered questions concerning his sources of income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13645 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Henry E. Stothard
on around him were not impaired. On appeal, we examine the record for facts to support the findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11178 - 2017-09-19
on around him were not impaired. On appeal, we examine the record for facts to support the findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11178 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying her motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077740 - 2026-02-17
denying her motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077740 - 2026-02-17
Travis E. C. v. Carl C.
court may enter such findings, conclusions and order as it considers are supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7743 - 2005-03-31
court may enter such findings, conclusions and order as it considers are supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7743 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerry L. Cox
a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13642 - 2005-03-31
a response. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13642 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel W. Corrigan
exception for records of regularly conducted activity. Corrigan further contends that the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8888 - 2005-03-31
exception for records of regularly conducted activity. Corrigan further contends that the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8888 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212739 - 2018-05-11
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212739 - 2018-05-11
Frontsheet
to the public but, given the record of quality legal work prior to his revocation, reinstatement was likely
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30379 - 2007-09-24
to the public but, given the record of quality legal work prior to his revocation, reinstatement was likely
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30379 - 2007-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165263 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165263 - 2017-09-21