Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33781 - 33790 of 68274 for did.
Search results 33781 - 33790 of 68274 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Husbeck’s conviction. Husbeck was advised of his right to respond to the report, but he did not respond
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05
Husbeck’s conviction. Husbeck was advised of his right to respond to the report, but he did not respond
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
of twenty-five years’ probation. Guman did not have a direct appeal. ¶3 In 2005, Guman filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132843 - 2015-01-12
of twenty-five years’ probation. Guman did not have a direct appeal. ¶3 In 2005, Guman filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132843 - 2015-01-12
State v. Joseph C. Evans
, indicates that Evans did not invoke his right to remain silent. Schaepe testified that Evans told him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12406 - 2005-03-31
, indicates that Evans did not invoke his right to remain silent. Schaepe testified that Evans told him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
defense at trial was that he did not strike the victim with intent to cause bodily harm, a required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632883 - 2023-03-14
defense at trial was that he did not strike the victim with intent to cause bodily harm, a required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632883 - 2023-03-14
[PDF]
Frank Balistreri v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
testified that Balistreri “did not seem to be impaired.” Bell testified that Balistreri told him he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8343 - 2017-09-19
testified that Balistreri “did not seem to be impaired.” Bell testified that Balistreri told him he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8343 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jerry D. Gragg
the vehicle while intoxicated—did not provide sufficient probable cause to arrest him. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7633 - 2005-03-31
the vehicle while intoxicated—did not provide sufficient probable cause to arrest him. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not fully consider relevant sentencing factors and imposed a harsh and excessive sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174157 - 2017-09-21
did not fully consider relevant sentencing factors and imposed a harsh and excessive sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174157 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, 1990. Cliff did not meet this deadline, and in October 1990 and February 1991 the court declined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53527 - 2010-08-18
, 1990. Cliff did not meet this deadline, and in October 1990 and February 1991 the court declined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53527 - 2010-08-18
Elizabeth M. Gibson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
the jury’s verdict, not for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have reached but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11026 - 2005-03-31
the jury’s verdict, not for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have reached but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11026 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court did not follow the joint recommendation and sentenced Medina to 25 years of initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050844 - 2025-12-17
. The circuit court did not follow the joint recommendation and sentenced Medina to 25 years of initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050844 - 2025-12-17