Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33791 - 33800 of 70405 for his.
Search results 33791 - 33800 of 70405 for his.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he understood. In addition, Brandon inquired when he could have his electronic monitoring ankle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462945 - 2021-12-14
that he understood. In addition, Brandon inquired when he could have his electronic monitoring ankle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462945 - 2021-12-14
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Flick
correctly rejected his claim. Therefore, we affirm the amended judgment and order. In 1994, upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14844 - 2017-09-21
correctly rejected his claim. Therefore, we affirm the amended judgment and order. In 1994, upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14844 - 2017-09-21
State v. Phillip C. Ziegler
to a new trial, either because the State withheld evidence that would have supported his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15987 - 2005-03-31
to a new trial, either because the State withheld evidence that would have supported his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15987 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14), 1 motion. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163624 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14), 1 motion. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163624 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Matthew G. Hill appeals from an order summarily denying his successive postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29409 - 2007-06-18
CURIAM. Matthew G. Hill appeals from an order summarily denying his successive postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29409 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101290 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101290 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a circuit court order concerning the division of a parcel of real property following his divorce from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773400 - 2024-03-07
a circuit court order concerning the division of a parcel of real property following his divorce from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773400 - 2024-03-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
from the entry of Carradine’s guilty plea. Carradine contends in his response that his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110987 - 2017-09-21
from the entry of Carradine’s guilty plea. Carradine contends in his response that his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
upon his guilty pleas. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997634 - 2025-08-20
upon his guilty pleas. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997634 - 2025-08-20
State v. Michael H. Woeshnick
jurisdiction because, in his view, the criminal complaint was invalid for not alleging an offense. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14862 - 2005-03-31
jurisdiction because, in his view, the criminal complaint was invalid for not alleging an offense. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14862 - 2005-03-31