Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3381 - 3390 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3381 - 3390 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction. The Honorable Jonathan D. Watts entered the order denying Grant’s motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155727 - 2017-09-21
of conviction. The Honorable Jonathan D. Watts entered the order denying Grant’s motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155727 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reconsideration motion. A person is entitled to sentence credit only for time in custody “in connection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250717 - 2019-11-25
reconsideration motion. A person is entitled to sentence credit only for time in custody “in connection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250717 - 2019-11-25
[PDF]
Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
and Theresa and back again changed the character of the property by virtue of its conversion into a joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5182 - 2017-09-19
and Theresa and back again changed the character of the property by virtue of its conversion into a joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5182 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. This case arose on cross-motions for summary judgment after psychologist Marc Ackerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32834 - 2008-06-03
PER CURIAM. This case arose on cross-motions for summary judgment after psychologist Marc Ackerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32834 - 2008-06-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
., and Snyder, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case arose on cross-motions for summary judgment after psychologist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32834 - 2014-09-15
., and Snyder, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case arose on cross-motions for summary judgment after psychologist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32834 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Lyons’ suppression motion. The court found Lyons was not “in custody” for No. 2021AP687-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634588 - 2023-03-22
Lyons’ suppression motion. The court found Lyons was not “in custody” for No. 2021AP687-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634588 - 2023-03-22
[PDF]
WI 50
and custody"; 2) be "an adult who has been determined to be incompetent by a circuit court"; 3) be "so
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82775 - 2014-09-15
and custody"; 2) be "an adult who has been determined to be incompetent by a circuit court"; 3) be "so
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82775 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
and custody"; 2) be "an adult who has been determined to be incompetent by a circuit court"; 3) be "so totally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82775 - 2013-09-15
and custody"; 2) be "an adult who has been determined to be incompetent by a circuit court"; 3) be "so totally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82775 - 2013-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to change his prison custody classification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93275 - 2014-09-15
to change his prison custody classification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93275 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
request to change his prison custody classification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93275 - 2013-02-20
request to change his prison custody classification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93275 - 2013-02-20