Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3381 - 3390 of 29739 for des.
Search results 3381 - 3390 of 29739 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
review the application of constitutional principles to the trial court’s findings de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48261 - 2010-03-23
review the application of constitutional principles to the trial court’s findings de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48261 - 2010-03-23
2008 WI APP 139
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2008-09-23
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id., ¶11. ¶11 The Osborns’ argument fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33627 - 2008-09-23
CA Blank Order
Street Milwaukee, WI 53233 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters 222 East Erie Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95094 - 2013-04-02
Street Milwaukee, WI 53233 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters 222 East Erie Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95094 - 2013-04-02
Heritage Mutual Insurance Company v. Richard J. Janda II
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. M&I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3245 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. M&I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3245 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of constitutional principles to the trial court’s findings de novo. State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48261 - 2014-09-15
of constitutional principles to the trial court’s findings de novo. State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48261 - 2014-09-15
Robert Bingen v. Lisa Bzdusek
). When reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4578 - 2005-03-31
). When reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4578 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keefe S. Adams
we review de novo. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. Milwaukee Brewers, 111 Wis.2d 571, 577, 331 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10950 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue v. Milwaukee Brewers, 111 Wis.2d 571, 577, 331 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10950 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rock County v. Richard L.P.
). Richard does not contest the facts on appeal, thus we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19088 - 2017-09-21
). Richard does not contest the facts on appeal, thus we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19088 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶11 “An order granting judgment on the pleadings presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715815 - 2023-10-17
¶11 “An order granting judgment on the pleadings presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715815 - 2023-10-17
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Z. P.
County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Thomas Z.P. seeks a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4426 - 2017-09-19
County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Thomas Z.P. seeks a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4426 - 2017-09-19