Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3381 - 3390 of 6391 for dr.
Search results 3381 - 3390 of 6391 for dr.
Brian C. Painter v. Dentistry Examining Board
. Painter argues that his expert, Dr. James Rollefson, provided credible testimony that because Painter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5578 - 2005-03-31
. Painter argues that his expert, Dr. James Rollefson, provided credible testimony that because Painter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5578 - 2005-03-31
Charlie Tate, Jr. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin
was “temporary.” The medical records certainly do not support that testimony. Mr. Tate told Dr. John Watt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16331 - 2005-03-31
was “temporary.” The medical records certainly do not support that testimony. Mr. Tate told Dr. John Watt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16331 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Charlie Tate, Jr. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin
. Tate told Dr. John Watt that, not only was his back pain worse after falling at work, but that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16331 - 2017-09-21
. Tate told Dr. John Watt that, not only was his back pain worse after falling at work, but that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16331 - 2017-09-21
Armund M. Janto v. Monica L. Janto
witness. Dr. Marc J. Ackerman stated in his initial report: Unfortunately, this case brings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4525 - 2005-03-31
witness. Dr. Marc J. Ackerman stated in his initial report: Unfortunately, this case brings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
attached Dr. Lisowksi’s report to the postconviction reply brief, which was the first time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34357 - 2014-09-15
attached Dr. Lisowksi’s report to the postconviction reply brief, which was the first time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34357 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brian C. Painter v. Dentistry Examining Board
Painter’s third argument raises an issue of credibility. Painter argues that his expert, Dr. James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5578 - 2017-09-19
Painter’s third argument raises an issue of credibility. Painter argues that his expert, Dr. James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5578 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph P.
to the DOC psychologists. Dr. Debra Anderson evaluated him during the intake process, and Dr. Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9674 - 2005-03-31
to the DOC psychologists. Dr. Debra Anderson evaluated him during the intake process, and Dr. Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9674 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph P.
to the DOC psychologists. Dr. Debra Anderson evaluated him during the intake process, and Dr. Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9675 - 2005-03-31
to the DOC psychologists. Dr. Debra Anderson evaluated him during the intake process, and Dr. Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Hospital for Children’s Hospital in St. Paul, Minnesota. Dr. Gary Schwartz arranged Jason’s transfer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59536 - 2014-09-15
Hospital for Children’s Hospital in St. Paul, Minnesota. Dr. Gary Schwartz arranged Jason’s transfer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59536 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mervel L. Eagans, Jr.
presented two witnesses, Dr. Meg Cho, a psychologist employed with the Department of Corrections, and Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12954 - 2007-03-15
presented two witnesses, Dr. Meg Cho, a psychologist employed with the Department of Corrections, and Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12954 - 2007-03-15