Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3381 - 3390 of 10291 for ed.
Search results 3381 - 3390 of 10291 for ed.
CA Blank Order
the discovery and the elements of the charges, she “reconsider[ed]” her decision to enter the guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92004 - 2013-01-21
the discovery and the elements of the charges, she “reconsider[ed]” her decision to enter the guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92004 - 2013-01-21
State v. Douglas Wolff
with the ABA Standards for Criminal Justice (Trial by Jury) (2d ed. 1978), and this standard is emerging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10701 - 2005-03-31
with the ABA Standards for Criminal Justice (Trial by Jury) (2d ed. 1978), and this standard is emerging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10701 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher P. Marshall
was in possession of the documents he requested,” he could have “simply ask[ed] the trial court for a short recess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4778 - 2005-03-31
was in possession of the documents he requested,” he could have “simply ask[ed] the trial court for a short recess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4778 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Dictionary 873 (3d ed. 1993)). “‘Excusable neglect is that neglect which might have been the act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46523 - 2010-02-01
Dictionary 873 (3d ed. 1993)). “‘Excusable neglect is that neglect which might have been the act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46523 - 2010-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
[,] sometimes back and forth.” See Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 460 (unabr. ed. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
[,] sometimes back and forth.” See Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 460 (unabr. ed. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
State v. Jonathan V. Manke
by the prosecution and remand[ed] the matter to this Court for resentencing. I do find that under the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14452 - 2005-03-31
by the prosecution and remand[ed] the matter to this Court for resentencing. I do find that under the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14452 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the possessor claim[ed] the land as his own.” Pierz v. Gorski, 88 Wis. 2d 131, 137, 276 N.W.2d 352 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64160 - 2011-05-17
that the possessor claim[ed] the land as his own.” Pierz v. Gorski, 88 Wis. 2d 131, 137, 276 N.W.2d 352 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64160 - 2011-05-17
State v. Heather C.P.
with that of tolling. See Blacks Law Dictionary 321, 583 and 1488 (6th ed. 1990). Moreover, because both M.G. and J.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12049 - 2005-03-31
with that of tolling. See Blacks Law Dictionary 321, 583 and 1488 (6th ed. 1990). Moreover, because both M.G. and J.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12049 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, as happened here. In denying the postconviction motion, the circuit court “adopt[ed] the State’s proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
, as happened here. In denying the postconviction motion, the circuit court “adopt[ed] the State’s proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supervision based on its finding that she had “faithfully follow[ed] the requirements” of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195922 - 2017-09-21
supervision based on its finding that she had “faithfully follow[ed] the requirements” of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195922 - 2017-09-21