Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33801 - 33810 of 43268 for t o.

State v. Karl H. Amenson
was unduly harsh and excessive. Our supreme court has held that “[t]here is no requirement that defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5381 - 2005-03-31

State v. Harold W. Zastrow
), which said: [T]he phrase “new factor” refers to a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2727 - 2005-03-31

City of La Crosse v. Douglas N. Hastad
in the property. The City provides no direct reply. Rather, the City states: “[I]t is noteworthy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18669 - 2005-06-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
those addressed in this opinion, I reject those arguments as undeveloped. ¶10 “[T]he ultimate issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833101 - 2024-08-01

State v. Steven Claus
after the event to be proved: [T]he fact that the analysis shows that the person had an alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13858 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29511 - 2007-06-27

Alice L. Andrews v. Town of Balsam Lake
, “[t]he court shall not vacate any parts of the plat which have been dedicated to and accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2136 - 2005-03-31

North Central Forklift, Inc. v. T.J. Brownson
, and observed that “[t]hey're trying to twist and distort this thing well beyond what it was filed as.” North
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15951 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, Michael T. Harrill and Melanie Harrill, Defendants-Appellants. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108789 - 2014-03-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the officers encouraged Brunette to tell them what happened, adding that “[t]he longer this drags on, it’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938405 - 2025-04-08