Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33811 - 33820 of 68499 for did.
Search results 33811 - 33820 of 68499 for did.
2011 WI APP 31
erroneously exercised its discretion because the court did not address whether the records would be relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59779 - 2012-01-22
erroneously exercised its discretion because the court did not address whether the records would be relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59779 - 2012-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
faced. The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. ¶8 Kelly also challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30621 - 2007-10-16
faced. The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. ¶8 Kelly also challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30621 - 2007-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
then filed a postconviction motion in the trial court; however, in it he did not raise the issue of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29963 - 2007-08-13
then filed a postconviction motion in the trial court; however, in it he did not raise the issue of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29963 - 2007-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
did not respond to several court requests in June 2012 to schedule a hearing. When a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107651 - 2014-02-03
did not respond to several court requests in June 2012 to schedule a hearing. When a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107651 - 2014-02-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
immaterial, noting: The problem in this case is the 21 witnesses who say that you did it, they saw you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86027 - 2014-09-15
immaterial, noting: The problem in this case is the 21 witnesses who say that you did it, they saw you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86027 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.[3] Debra, Lori, and Ronald consented to the plan, as did Donna’s power of attorney. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123235 - 2014-10-06
.[3] Debra, Lori, and Ronald consented to the plan, as did Donna’s power of attorney. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123235 - 2014-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Karl M. Gebhard
did not return to work for six weeks after the assault due to his injuries. The physician testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12298 - 2017-09-21
did not return to work for six weeks after the assault due to his injuries. The physician testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12298 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court did not err by allowing the State to elicit testimony about Brinkmeier’s refusal to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100249 - 2017-09-21
court did not err by allowing the State to elicit testimony about Brinkmeier’s refusal to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100249 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
did not specifically follow up on the listed burglary conviction until after the search of Sammon’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85239 - 2012-07-24
did not specifically follow up on the listed burglary conviction until after the search of Sammon’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85239 - 2012-07-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
area. So [the trial court] think[s] the fact that Officer Glover did not use the words “drug dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27387 - 2010-12-11
area. So [the trial court] think[s] the fact that Officer Glover did not use the words “drug dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27387 - 2010-12-11