Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33811 - 33820 of 65728 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 33811 - 33820 of 65728 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660055 - 2023-05-23
reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660055 - 2023-05-23
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110338 - 2014-04-10
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110338 - 2014-04-10
[PDF]
State v. Donald D. Laufer
74 at ¶¶20-21. Under that standard, the waiver is valid if the record shows a deliberate choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4041 - 2017-09-20
74 at ¶¶20-21. Under that standard, the waiver is valid if the record shows a deliberate choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4041 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282369 - 2020-08-26
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282369 - 2020-08-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045728 - 2025-12-10
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045728 - 2025-12-10
State v. Cornell Clark
the officers’ and could have been anticipated based on the officers’ reports. The record provides no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16218 - 2005-03-31
the officers’ and could have been anticipated based on the officers’ reports. The record provides no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16218 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review No. 2019AP1005-CRNM 2 of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=276818 - 2020-08-11
and conducting an independent review No. 2019AP1005-CRNM 2 of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=276818 - 2020-08-11
COURT OF APPEALS
“the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief….” Id. at 309-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36048 - 2009-04-07
“the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief….” Id. at 309-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36048 - 2009-04-07
[PDF]
State v. Terry G. Seitz
, and that omission is fatal to his appeal. ¶4 The supreme court has explained that when “[t]he record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6385 - 2017-09-19
, and that omission is fatal to his appeal. ¶4 The supreme court has explained that when “[t]he record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6385 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 RULE 809.21. After my independent review of the records, I conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148193 - 2017-09-21
2 RULE 809.21. After my independent review of the records, I conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148193 - 2017-09-21