Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33811 - 33820 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] State v. Peter A. Fonte
of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18576 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James M. Gallagher v. Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative
to the entry of a conditional judgment, obtain a mandatory appeal of an interlocutory order. Id. at 269
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3541 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
," id., ¶3, and so reversed the circuit court and remanded for further briefing. Crown petitioned
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237774 - 2019-05-30

James M. Gallagher v. Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative
a mandatory appeal of an interlocutory order. Id. at 269. ¶10 Following the dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3541 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
if convicted.’” Id. at 260 (quoting Wis. Stat. § 971.08(1)); see also § 971.08(1) (addressing trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69454 - 2011-08-10

[PDF] Renee K. VanCleve v. City of Marinette
that argument in Weis because Wis. Stat. § 81.17 establishes successive liability. Id. No. 01-0231
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16468 - 2017-09-21

L. M. S. v. William Earl Atkinson
the proceedings.” Id. at 514. Accordingly, Atkinson maintains the circuit court should have granted his requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25293 - 2008-03-25

[PDF] Brief per CTO of 10-14-2021 (Congressmen)
citizens into different voting districts on the basis of race,” unless it can satisfy strict scrutiny, id
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefctocongressmen.pdf - 2021-10-25

[PDF] 2025XX001330 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Decision)
); redistricting is the drawing of new political boundaries[.]” Id., ¶5 n.2. But this statement did not address
/supreme/docs/25xx1330order.pdf - 2025-11-25

[PDF] 2025XX001438 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Decision)
boundaries[.]” Id., ¶5 n.2. But this statement did not address the meaning of § 801.50(4m)—a statute
/supreme/docs/25xx1438order.pdf - 2025-11-25