Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33811 - 33820 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 33811 - 33820 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Richard I. An v. Eleanor M. Tobon
. Here, Eleanor's and Norman's real estate expert claimed partition in kind physically suited the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10891 - 2005-03-31
. Here, Eleanor's and Norman's real estate expert claimed partition in kind physically suited the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10891 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
entered. The no-merit report next addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93436 - 2013-02-25
entered. The no-merit report next addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93436 - 2013-02-25
Terry K. Voice v. Mary Ellen Johnson
a $345 share of the $442 tax rebate. He also claims the court overvalued certain assets, undervalued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2876 - 2005-03-31
a $345 share of the $442 tax rebate. He also claims the court overvalued certain assets, undervalued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Allan R. Washachek
2 claims the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2526 - 2017-09-19
2 claims the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2526 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lonnie A. Mayer
a postconviction motion claiming that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the entrapment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21224 - 2017-09-21
a postconviction motion claiming that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the entrapment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21224 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Parks
intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. Parks claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14146 - 2014-09-15
intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. Parks claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14146 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
claims the trial court should have instructed the jury that the act of handling a controlled substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26867 - 2006-10-23
claims the trial court should have instructed the jury that the act of handling a controlled substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26867 - 2006-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit to a claim that Ross’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. See U.S. CONST
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
merit to a claim that Ross’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. See U.S. CONST
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
1 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7752 - 2017-09-19
1 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7752 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of their concession, the Durchslags now claim summary judgment was inappropriate because the trust is ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35191 - 2009-01-12
of their concession, the Durchslags now claim summary judgment was inappropriate because the trust is ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35191 - 2009-01-12