Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33811 - 33820 of 64166 for records.
Search results 33811 - 33820 of 64166 for records.
State v. Milton H. Smith
, a more detailed review of Smith’s driving record revealed two prior OWI convictions, which occurred July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31
, a more detailed review of Smith’s driving record revealed two prior OWI convictions, which occurred July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that denied his “petition for writ of error.” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239897 - 2019-04-25
that denied his “petition for writ of error.” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239897 - 2019-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jurors nodding off. MS. FALK: Yes. That was what we wanted to make a record on. No. 17, according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137502 - 2017-09-21
jurors nodding off. MS. FALK: Yes. That was what we wanted to make a record on. No. 17, according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eric S. Fenz
to the defendant the burden to “show some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4013 - 2017-09-20
to the defendant the burden to “show some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4013 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Alphonso Hubanks
. In addition, the record suggests that the victim’s voice identification of Hubanks was reliable under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13266 - 2017-09-21
. In addition, the record suggests that the victim’s voice identification of Hubanks was reliable under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13266 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael W. Worden
a sentence “if the record showed a process of reasoning based on legally relevant factors.” Id. at 364
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31
a sentence “if the record showed a process of reasoning based on legally relevant factors.” Id. at 364
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] court must state on the record the reasons for so modifying the first sentence.” Grobarchik v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248643 - 2019-10-15
] court must state on the record the reasons for so modifying the first sentence.” Grobarchik v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248643 - 2019-10-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for challenging jurisdiction. The record shows that Ross was personally served on September 18, 2015
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197312 - 2017-10-04
for challenging jurisdiction. The record shows that Ross was personally served on September 18, 2015
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197312 - 2017-10-04
State v. Daniel E.
not anywhere near a close call.” ¶16 We have read the record in full and we fully agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16063 - 2005-03-31
not anywhere near a close call.” ¶16 We have read the record in full and we fully agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16063 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2022AP67-CRNM 2022AP68-CRNM 2022AP69-CRNM 2 independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744965 - 2023-12-27
. 2022AP67-CRNM 2022AP68-CRNM 2022AP69-CRNM 2 independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744965 - 2023-12-27