Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33821 - 33830 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 33821 - 33830 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
State v. Patricia A. Weed
2003 WI 85 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 01-1476-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16514 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI 85 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 01-1476-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16514 - 2005-03-31
WI App 148 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1952 Complete Title o...
2011 WI App 148 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1952 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71748 - 2011-11-28
2011 WI App 148 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1952 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71748 - 2011-11-28
[PDF]
WI App 148
2011 WI App 148 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2010AP1952
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71748 - 2014-09-15
2011 WI App 148 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2010AP1952
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71748 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patricia A. Weed
2003 WI 85 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-1476-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16514 - 2017-09-21
2003 WI 85 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-1476-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 3
2026 WI App 3 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2024AP1711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045484 - 2026-02-10
2026 WI App 3 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2024AP1711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045484 - 2026-02-10
State v. David S. Rhodes
. Secondly, as our strategy evolved in the case, it was apparent that he was going to testify and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8436 - 2005-03-31
. Secondly, as our strategy evolved in the case, it was apparent that he was going to testify and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wisconsin Seafood Company, Inc. v. David P. Fisher
Court Case No. 99-CV-356, Wisconsin Seafood Company, Inc., et, al. v. David Fisher, pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5481 - 2017-09-19
Court Case No. 99-CV-356, Wisconsin Seafood Company, Inc., et, al. v. David Fisher, pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5481 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that if his case were to be tried again, Mr. Taylor’s testimony could be pivotal, for at least two reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145216 - 2017-09-21
that if his case were to be tried again, Mr. Taylor’s testimony could be pivotal, for at least two reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145216 - 2017-09-21
Robert E. Lee & Associates, Inc. v. David J. Peters
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10267 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10267 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 905.10(3)(b) (2011-12).1 For the reasons we explain below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94658 - 2014-09-15
in this case, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 905.10(3)(b) (2011-12).1 For the reasons we explain below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94658 - 2014-09-15