Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33821 - 33830 of 40045 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 33821 - 33830 of 40045 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
to the supreme court’s statement in State v. Schaller, 70 Wis.2d 107, 111, 233 N.W.2d 416, 418 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
to the supreme court’s statement in State v. Schaller, 70 Wis.2d 107, 111, 233 N.W.2d 416, 418 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kevin Kirsch v. Pat Siedschlag
of the attorney. Other evidentiary material submitted by the taxpayers supported their own sworn statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10414 - 2017-09-20
of the attorney. Other evidentiary material submitted by the taxpayers supported their own sworn statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10414 - 2017-09-20
State v. Vlado Gazic
in the statements of witnesses do not render the testimony inherently or patently incredible, but simply create
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11392 - 2005-03-31
in the statements of witnesses do not render the testimony inherently or patently incredible, but simply create
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
County was the proper venue for the petition. DOC cites Christopher’s statement to the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300396 - 2020-10-29
County was the proper venue for the petition. DOC cites Christopher’s statement to the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300396 - 2020-10-29
2009 WI APP 70
. 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3); 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(g)(1). Where rein- statement is deemed inappropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36138 - 2009-05-26
. 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3); 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(g)(1). Where rein- statement is deemed inappropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36138 - 2009-05-26
State v. Carolyn G.
than by default judgment. Although this court does not disagree with the general policy statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5013 - 2005-03-31
than by default judgment. Although this court does not disagree with the general policy statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5013 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of his statements and other evidence. “[A] circuit court must establish that a defendant understands
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94997 - 2013-04-01
of his statements and other evidence. “[A] circuit court must establish that a defendant understands
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94997 - 2013-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
emphasis on the need for treatment in a confined setting was consistent with the court’s statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17
emphasis on the need for treatment in a confined setting was consistent with the court’s statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078680 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” statements, and the fact that the vehicle was idling with the headlamps off at a stop sign in a parking lot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103040 - 2017-09-21
” statements, and the fact that the vehicle was idling with the headlamps off at a stop sign in a parking lot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103040 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eugene F. Line
of a trial court’s sentencing discretion. Id. The court concluded that “a statement by the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court’s sentencing discretion. Id. The court concluded that “a statement by the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31