Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 33831 - 33840 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 33831 - 33840 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
(1) claim, whether brought under subsections (a), (d), or (h), is that the motion to reopen be made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94205 - 2013-03-18
(1) claim, whether brought under subsections (a), (d), or (h), is that the motion to reopen be made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94205 - 2013-03-18
State v. Donnie Cobbs
. The court denied the motion and Cobbs appeals. Cobbs claims that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12909 - 2005-03-31
. The court denied the motion and Cobbs appeals. Cobbs claims that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12909 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
AM Transportation, Inc. v. Matarah Industries, Inc.
Transportation, Inc. Matarah claims the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2436 - 2017-09-19
Transportation, Inc. Matarah claims the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2436 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Deborah Martin-Semrow v. Marc Raymond Semrow
evidence of record, is insufficient to establish the firm’s claim to funds so plainly designated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13612 - 2017-09-21
evidence of record, is insufficient to establish the firm’s claim to funds so plainly designated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13612 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed that it suffered a loss of $5380.72, that is, the amount of the overdraft caused by the $7000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114653 - 2014-06-16
claimed that it suffered a loss of $5380.72, that is, the amount of the overdraft caused by the $7000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114653 - 2014-06-16
Rayford N. Drake v. Linda F. Fikes
. Drake claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it permanently denied him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10711 - 2005-03-31
. Drake claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it permanently denied him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10711 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Konaha
belies Konaha’s claims. ¶8 The court considered the appropriate factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5740 - 2005-03-31
belies Konaha’s claims. ¶8 The court considered the appropriate factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5740 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jesse J. C.
recantations. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it ruled he had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2743 - 2005-03-31
recantations. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it ruled he had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We further conclude that Lietz’s claims either were raised, or could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364322 - 2021-05-11
. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We further conclude that Lietz’s claims either were raised, or could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364322 - 2021-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the recovery cost and Viking denied the claim. ¶3 McGeshick then assigned “whatever causes of action he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122262 - 2014-09-23
for the recovery cost and Viking denied the claim. ¶3 McGeshick then assigned “whatever causes of action he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122262 - 2014-09-23